|
From: | Michael D Godfrey |
Subject: | Re: stable sorts |
Date: | Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:40:17 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 08/25/2012 09:55 PM, Ed Meyer wrote:
Just because it has kept the order of x(2) and x(3) does not necessarily mean it is a stable sort;Yes. But, this thread started from an error on my part. I had thought that Ben's fix for interp1 was based on the Octave sort not being stable. The real problem was with the direction of the discontinuity mechanism in interp1. I am pretty sure that Octave sort is stable, but this could be checked more, of course. Michael |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |