[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LLVM not picked up - too old version?
|
From: |
Philip Nienhuis |
|
Subject: |
LLVM not picked up - too old version? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:05:04 -0700 (PDT) |
What version of LLVM is needed these days?
I have llvm 3.0; configure output at the end doesn't mention the llvm
libs/flags/include but only says something like:
"JIT compiler for loops: false"
AFAICR a week or two weeks ago it did pick up the llvm stuff (that is, I saw
the llvm libs/include/flags mentioned in configure's output).
linux Mageia 2, gcc 4.6.3, Pentium M
Philip
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/LLVM-not-picked-up-too-old-version-tp4643952.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- LLVM not picked up - too old version?,
Philip Nienhuis <=