2012/12/13 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>>
On 13 December 2012 11:55, Júlio Hoffimann
<address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
> Jordi,
>
> Failures mostly related to NaN, Inf extreme cases. It's strange, i'll
> investigate if something changed in the standard, i doubt.
>
> Marco,
>
> C++98
> total 390M
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.2K 2012-12-12 12:55 liboctave.la
<http://liboctave.la>*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 158M 2012-12-12 12:55 liboctave.so.1.0.1*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.4K 2012-12-12 12:56 liboctgui.la
<http://liboctgui.la>*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17M 2012-12-12 12:56 liboctgui.so.0.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.3K 2012-12-12 12:56 liboctinterp.la
<http://liboctinterp.la>*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 217M 2012-12-12 12:56 liboctinterp.so.1.0.1*
>
> C++11
> total 44M
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.2K 2012-12-13 13:42 liboctave.la
<http://liboctave.la>*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 19M 2012-12-13 13:42 liboctave.so.1.0.1*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.4K 2012-12-13 13:43 liboctgui.la
<http://liboctgui.la>*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.7M 2012-12-13 13:43 liboctgui.so.0.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.3K 2012-12-13 13:42 liboctinterp.la
<http://liboctinterp.la>*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23M 2012-12-13 13:42 liboctinterp.so.1.0.1*
>
> Huge differences, almost 9x reduction. Isn't that cool?!
Are both stripped? What's are the sizes pre-stripping?
- Jordi G. H.