Re: What to do with builtin functions not in libinterp subdirectory

[Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso]

On 18 March 2013 12:14, Daniel J Sebald <address@hidden> wrote:

> once you have a prototype function designed in C++, one could
> write an Octave script that scans the source tree replacing all XDEFUNs,
> then DEFUNs, etc. with the new prototype.

I like the idea in principle of replacing CPP macros with C++ classes,
and I have undertaken such macro-slaying quests in the past. However,
I think in this case writing some script to do the conversion cleanly
might be more work than ad-hoc methods. Don't let that discourage you,
though. I like this idea a lot.

- Jordi G. H.