[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package optim, expfit
From: |
Olaf Till |
Subject: |
Re: package optim, expfit |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:34:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:42:15PM -0500, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote:
> His test script does not make much sense to me.
> The input data has 2 exponents and he fits it with one and he gets
> two different results from two different methods.
> Of course a more generic one gets a better looking fit then the one
> that make some assumptions about the models.
> Looks OK to me.
>
> Dmitri.
> --
Thanks for both answers. I made a summary, also of some tests, for the
bug report (link in the first post), suggesting there is no need for a
change.
Olaf
--
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature