|
From: | Ed Meyer |
Subject: | Re: eig function project |
Date: | Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:43:46 -0700 |
> This way if the lapack folks
> don't fix *geev at least octave could pass the balancing counterexample given in
> the ML docA comment I forgot to include in the last mail, I'd say that the 'nobalance' option is in fact the workaround that Matlab came up with to avoid that feature from dgeev but it is still left to the user criteria. So, a Matlab like functionality is a must, but I was thinking that maybe including an 'auto' option that determines if balancing is required or not, could be a nice feature and a good GSoC project that would require a lot of understanding on when balancing is required.Rafael González
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |