Re: libgui/src/resource-manager.cc contains removed function names. Should we remove them?

[John W. Eaton]

On 09/15/2013 07:56 AM, Andreas Weber wrote:
> Dear octave maintainers,
> I'm currently searching and removing references to already removed
> functions and stumbled over resource-manager.cc.
>
>  From NEWS:
> "   The following functions were deprecated in Octave 3.2 and have been
>      removed from Octave 3.6.
>
>        create_set          spcholinv    splu
>        dmult               spcumprod    spmax
>        iscommand           spcumsum     spmin
>        israwcommand        spdet        spprod
>        lchol               spdiag       spqr
>        loadimage           spfind       spsum
>        mark_as_command     sphcat       spsumsq
>        mark_as_rawcommand  spinv        spvcat
>        spatan2             spkron       str2mat
>        spchol              splchol      unmark_command
>        spchol2inv          split        unmark_rawcommand"
>
>
> but these functions are still in resource-manager.cc. I'm not familiar
> with this but I guess the resource_manager::octave_keywords are, for
> example, used for syntax highlighting?
>
> Can I remove the "removed functions" from resource-manager.cc or is
> there a reason to keep them there?

This list should really not be static.  There are functions in Octave 
that return lists of keyword and function names that should be used 
instead to build the list.  I've been meaning to fix this but just 
haven't gotten around to doing it.

jwe