[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: constant folding
|
From: |
Juan Pablo Carbajal |
|
Subject: |
Re: constant folding |
|
Date: |
Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:41:03 +0100 |
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:09 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> In any case, you can sort of fake it by making
> those values persistent, because then they will only be initialized
> once.
IMHO, persistent would be the correct way to go in this case, not
really a fake, right? So why not encourage this use of persistent and
justify the removal of constant folding for these cases?