[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave on slashdot
|
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
|
Subject: |
Re: octave on slashdot |
|
Date: |
Sun, 29 Dec 2013 10:11:13 -0500 |
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 15:47 +0100, c. wrote:
> On 29 Dec 2013, at 14:57, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 15:31 -0800, fgnievinski wrote:
> >> octave compares unfavorably to other open source alternatives,
> >
> > As GNU software, Octave is not primarily "open source". It is free
> > software.
>
> You should post this comment to /. the post there starts with: "GNU
> Octave — the open source numerical computation suite compatible with
> MATLAB"
Yeah, they grabbed the title from Phoronix. I think it's too late to
be heard there, though. But perhaps Felipe can still hear me.
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed, (continued)
- Re: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed, Mike Miller, 2013/12/19
- Re: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed, John W. Eaton, 2013/12/19
- Re: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed, Nir Krakauer, 2013/12/28
- Re: octave on slashdot (was: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed_, fgnievinski, 2013/12/28
- Re: octave on slashdot, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/12/28
- Re: octave on slashdot, Felipe G. Nievinski, 2013/12/29
- Re: octave on slashdot, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/12/29
- Re: octave on slashdot, fgnievinski, 2013/12/29
- Re: octave on slashdot, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/12/29
- Re: octave on slashdot, c., 2013/12/29
- Re: octave on slashdot,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=