Re: very small packages - merge into general/miscelleneous or move into core

[c.]

On 17 Jan 2014, at 13:18, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:

>> OK, I'm very glad we agree 100% on this part.
>> 
>> So if a package is useful and maintained, do
>> you think we should care about how many functions
>> it contains?
> 
> No.

Sorry I think I had misunderstood your statement in this message, 
too many negations got me confused ;)

So you do agree that small packages are not a problem (or at least not your 
problem) 
if they have a maintainer, right?

How to rearrange functions in unmaintained packes is a different issue, then.
c.