Re: Octave FAQ update about GPL

[c.]

On 13 Feb 2014, at 08:32, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:

>  There is no existing text to back this conclusion up, other than the
>  statement in the Octave FAQ that makes no distinction between m-files
>  that call no functions and m-files that do call functions.
> 
>  If this is not true because the interpreted code calls GPL-licensed
>  library functions distributed with Octave, then we need to clarify
>  that better.

What about Octave-Forge functions?
These are distruibuted separately from Octave and can be called in m-files.
Why not ask about those too?

c.