|
From: | Muhali |
Subject: | Re: @(x) plus(x,++j) |
Date: | Fri, 23 May 2014 04:43:58 -0700 (PDT) |
right. I missed the argument for f. So what I meant was feval(f, 0) and, resp., feval(@(x) plus(x,++j), 0) -- View this message in context: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/x-plus-x-j-tp4664287p4664293.html Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |