Re: undefined compound chaining behavior

[Richard Crozier]

On 13/06/2014 09:31, Hossein Sajjadi wrote:
> > Arguments are essentially thus:
> >
> > 1. Octave does not necessarily follow exactly the operators of C++
> >
> > 2. The Octave devs have decided on the current behaviour of Octave
> > language which is determined by the design of the Octave interpreter,
> > and is independent of the C++ compiler
> >
> > QED
>
> your claim should be proved. I have bring many resons and c++ source
> code to prove my assersion.

Ahh, I see, sorry, could you give me the link again to the Octave C++ 
source code where this undefined behaviour statement occurs?

Richard

--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.