[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: parcellfun debug
From: |
Muhali |
Subject: |
Re: parcellfun debug |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jul 2015 02:46:06 -0700 (PDT) |
Olaf Till-2 wrote
>> Should I open a bug report and move
>> discussion there?
>
> I intend to follow this immediately, but if you wan't to have input
> from others, the bug tracker may be better. If you post larger or
> binary material, uploading it to the bug tracker is better.
I am getting closer. it is probably related to loading or not loading the
NaN package. Whatever, I think I just stumbled over the other problem that
parcellfun does not seem to accept two arguments, as in the cellfun example
cellfun ("atan2", {1, 0}, {0, 1})
Am I right?
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/parcellfun-debug-tp4671440p4671507.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- parcellfun debug, Muhali, 2015/07/07
- Re: parcellfun debug, Olaf Till, 2015/07/07
- Re: parcellfun debug, Muhali, 2015/07/09
- Re: parcellfun debug, Olaf Till, 2015/07/09
- Re: parcellfun debug,
Muhali <=
- Re: parcellfun debug, Olaf Till, 2015/07/09
- Re: parcellfun debug, Muhali, 2015/07/09
- Re: parcellfun debug, Olaf Till, 2015/07/09
- Re: parcellfun debug, Olaf Till, 2015/07/09