[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++11 now default?
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: C++11 now default? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:38:22 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 21:34:53 -0500, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> > On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:15 PM, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:23:26 -0800, Mike Miller wrote:
> >> Please try CXX="$CFLAGS -std=gnu++11" only.
> >
> > Ben, can you pull rev 0705248d47bf and try again without explicitly
> > specifying any -std= options? I made a change that fixed a problem with
> > C++11 detection with clang.
>
> I still get the error below.
>
> error: invalid argument '-std=gnu11' not allowed with 'C++/ObjC++’
I'm not sure I understand. Are you trying with no -std options at all in
either CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS? Note that "-std=gnu11" is not the same as
"-std=gnu++11".
--
mike
- Re: C++11 now default?, (continued)
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/22
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?,
Mike Miller <=
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/23
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/25
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/23