[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4
From: |
JohnD |
Subject: |
RE: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4 |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:36:17 -0500 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John W. Eaton [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:38 AM
> To: JohnD; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4
>
> On 03/11/2016 07:13 AM, JohnD wrote:
> >>
> >> Message: 7
> >> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:24:13 -0800
> >> From: Rik <address@hidden>
> >> To: Octave-Maintainers <address@hidden>, "John W.
> Eaton"
> >> <address@hidden>
> >> Subject: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4
> >> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >>
> >> jwe,
> >>
> >> I tested the new tarball at ftp://alpha.gnu.org. As expected for a
> > vanilla
> >> Linux system, it passed all tests and all build configurations
> >> including in-tree, out-of-tree builds, and 'make install' followed by
> > __run_test_suite__.
> >>
> >> --Rik
> >
> >
> > Compiling in mxe-octave with new tarball and running win7:
> >
> > PASS 13020
> > FAIL 0
> > XFAIL 27
> > SKIPPED 54
>
> I see almost the same result but I have 26 XFAIL and 13021 PASS. Here are
my
> XFAIL counts:
>
> libinterp\corefcn\conv2.cc-tst XFAIL 3
> libinterp\corefcn\max.cc-tst XFAIL 3
> general\num2str.m XFAIL 1
> polynomial\residue.m XFAIL 1
> testfun\speed.m XFAIL 1
> testfun\test.m XFAIL 1
> bug-38236.tst XFAIL 1
> classdef.tst XFAIL 2
> classes.tst XFAIL 11
> jit.tst XFAIL 2
>
> Which one(s) are different for you?
>
> Also, it's very nice to see that the packages are all cross compiled and
installed
> by the installer now!
>
> Uploading the nsis installer and the zip file distribution of the Windows
binary to
> alpha.gnu.org now.
>
> jwe
>
I also had:
miscellaneous\zip.m XFAIL 1 -- zip file cannot be found!
- Re: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4, (continued)