|
From: | Rik |
Subject: | Re: deftypefn or defun (deffn) |
Date: | Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:02:02 -0700 |
On 04/21/2016 10:27 AM,
address@hidden wrote:
This is the advantage of Octave-Forge. Packages can be more daring than the core, which must be more conservative and move more slowly. My point was that it looks like the maintenance burden would be smaller if a single style, whatever it is, were chosen. But beyond that it's the package author's decision what to do. --Rik |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |