octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: floating point precision control


From: Michael Godfrey
Subject: Re: floating point precision control
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:40:15 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1

John,
I think that this is right. Trying to use some capabilities beyond 64-bit IEEE may
work in some cases, but would necessarily introduce "unexpected" and variable
results which would depend in conditions which would be hard to control or
maintain. Reliability and stability are very important. They dominate occasional
improvements in precision.
Michael

On 07/12/2016 03:28 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
Maybe we should just try to do the best we can with 64-bit IEEE arithmetic and not try to use extended precision since it is impossible to always use 80-bit precision everywhere (intermediate values may be stored in 64-bit memory locations, for example) and a mixture of 64- and 80-bit arithmetic seems like it may be asking for unpredictable results?

jwe



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]