[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reformatting graphics demos
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: Reformatting graphics demos |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 19:54:04 -0400 |
> On Aug 15, 2016, at 7:21 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I just noticed this change:
>
> o changeset: 22566:1c4cd12987f5
> | user: Rik <address@hidden>
> | date: Mon Aug 15 15:15:30 2016 -0700
> | summary: Use Octave syntax in graphics demos.
>
> I prefer Octave syntax as well, but I thought we used Matlab-compatible
> syntax for those demos so it would be possible to run them in Matlab and
> easily compare the appearance of plots. Is that no longer a goal? Sorry if I
> missed a discussion about this.
>
> jwe
I also thought the agreement was to use Matlab syntax for graphics demos. For
example, from 3 weeks ago ;-)
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/283d8dfcad37
# HG changeset patch
# User Rik <address@hidden>
# Date 1469030091 25200
# Node ID 283d8dfcad373b2c11e2aa76e66a58b4a17a3dbc
# Parent c4901d7a2d7dcdc0a2d057748f603f06ce62731d
Make demos Matlab compatible for comparison with dump_demos script.
However, the above changeset isn’t consistent with applying Matlab syntax.
Example, the demos often use double-quotes, which Matlab doesn’t support.
Ben