Re: package maintainers please choose a package group

[Carlo De Falco]

> On 15 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Carlo De Falco <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 15 Mar 2017, at 17:13, Olaf Till <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> For mpi, sorry, but considering the history and the importance of this
>> package I object to making it external. If someone in addition to you
>> disagrees with me we should vote, and I'll detail my objections.
>> 
> 
> I just prepared a new release that contains essentially a complete rewrite of 
> the main functions in the package.
> If MPI is remaining in community section my "external" release is then to be 
> considered a fork.
> According to your rules, should I change the name of the package?

In any case I'm giving up the maintainace of the "community" version of MPI 
(which I had been the only contributor of since 2010, BTW).

Please remove my name in the DESCRIPTION and replace it with a new volunteer.

c.