Re: GSoC 2017- Application (Symbolic Package)

[NVS Abhilash]

Hi,

Thank you again for your valuable feedback.


Colin Macdonald-2 wrote
> In addition to the various patches you've been doing, a helpful next 
> step would be to address this comment, by tracking down the relevant 
> Octave bugs:
> 
> https://githqub.com/cbm755/octsympy/pull/590#issuecomment-283458422

I have tried to add some bug numbers to the application. Please verify are
they the correct ones which are needed to be resolved first.

I was not able to find exact bug report in core Octave for this: "indexing
constants with a classdef object". Can you help me with that?

Also is it completely not feasible to use this PR
[https://github.com/cbm755/octsympy/pull/590#issuecomment-283458422].
Because then it means I have to work on the existing implementation of @sym
and when that PR gets ready to be merged will there be more conflicts not
only merge conflicts but implementation wise?

I think it will depend on how much of the upstream issues are resolved in
the GSoC. But is there some other problems that I am missing?

Thanks,
NVS



-----
NVS Abhilash
--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/GSoC-2017-Application-Symbolic-Package-tp4682483p4682626.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.