octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: any impacts of adding this line to default .octaverc ?


From: Rik
Subject: Re: any impacts of adding this line to default .octaverc ?
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 11:44:53 -0700

On 08/02/2017 11:35 AM, address@hidden wrote:
Subject:
Re: any impacts of adding this line to default .octaverc ?
From:
Nicholas Jankowski <address@hidden>
Date:
08/02/2017 11:02 AM
To:
PhilipNienhuis <address@hidden>
CC:
octave-maintainers <address@hidden>
List-Post:
<mailto:address@hidden>
Precedence:
list
MIME-Version:
1.0
References:
<address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
In-Reply-To:
<address@hidden>
Message-ID:
<address@hidden>
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113acab235a6d40555c912c8"
Message:
2

Thoughts on whether a patch adding

if (exist(pkg("global_list"),"file") == 0)
  try
    pkg rebuild;
  catch
  end_try_catch
endif

to .octaverc should be something just limited to mxe-octave zip-distribution? all windows builds? Octave as a whole? or "that's a horrible idea come up with something better",  ?

I would make the minimal change necessary to fix the problem.  If other systems, like Linux, don't need this line then let's not include it just in case it might cause a problem.  Maybe start out with just applying it to the zip-distribution and see if that is enough.

--Rik




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]