|
From: | Aymeric Moizard |
Subject: | Re: [osip-dev] question about osip_transaction |
Date: | Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:25:07 +0100 |
Hi,
The only reason I did it without pointer was for simplicity. May be it was just a bad idea but that's the way it is now...
Do you reach any new limitations on your is with this change?
Regards,
Aymeric
Dalei LiuThanks,Hi,I have a quick question about the struct osip_transaction defined in osip.h. When I checked the source code, I found it's holding an element osip_srv_record_t record which is about 11KB. I'm just wondering why it is an instance instead of a pointer just like all the other structures inside the osip_transaction, because for me it looks like wasting memory for each transaction if the field is not in use. All the other elements of the osip_transaction in total is just about over 100 bytes. Is there any other concern about the design?
_______________________________________________
osip-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/osip-dev
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |