[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Memory update: using 55% less memory than 0.114...
From: |
Csv4Me2 |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Memory update: using 55% less memory than 0.114... |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Oct 2006 16:08:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.2 |
Yeah, saw that too. Wonderfull improvement!
Great job Charles, thanks!!
C
On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:57, jef_e wrote:
> Charles Kerr wrote:
> > I'm running out of tricks, though. :)
>
> Just wanted to toss in my last minute 2 cents on 0.114 and the patch
> before I move on to 0.115. I use Giganews and decided to let 0.114 pull
> in all 90 days worth of headers for alt.binaries.dvd just to see what
> happened. I hadn't loaded this group in the rewrite yet, so it got *ALL*
> headers that Giganews had.
>
> Currently, top shows:
> 23083 46.8 1490m 546m 944m 1968 1.4g 6832 12k 0 S 15 0 0.0 pan
>
> Don't want it to sound like I'm griping - on the contrary. As we all
> know, old Pan would have gone into a disk thrashing swap-fest long
> before it ever finished sorting the headers.
>
> As an FYI about the number of articles and parts that we are talking
> about here, the Event Log reports "Saved 31069539 parts, 257979 articles
> in "alt.binaries.dvd" in 167.3 seconds (1542 art/sec)" 31 million parts
> that I was able to pull in all at one time, rather than having to do it
> in small chunks. Nice!
>
> Based on what I'm seeing for groups with every day usage, having Pan
> occasionally get a bit bloaty for those rare times when I need to load
> (or reload) everything is something I can live with.
>
> Kudos and thanks for making this happen!
>
> jef
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pan-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users