[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [paragui-users] Why use XML for configuration?
From: |
Roger D. Vargas |
Subject: |
Re: [paragui-users] Why use XML for configuration? |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:27:56 -0400 (CDT) |
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Asko Kauppi wrote:
>
> Cast me stones (rather, tomatoes..? ;) but why does/should ParaGui use
> XML for configuration?
Seems to be the fashion now?
>
> Imho, something like Lua does the job of (dynamic) configuration
> better. It doesn't have configuration / programming split. It's all
> both. Better than XML. Better than (shell) scripts. Better than
> anything?
Could be, but I think xml does the job quite well. Anyway, if we find a
foll, sorry, I mean a volunteer, to do the change, I'll be happy. Surely
I know much more lua than xml.
--
Roger D. Vargas
ICQ: 117641572
Linux User: 180787
* Much to learn you still have *
Master Yoda, AOTC
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.
Re: [paragui-users] Don't R.I.P., ParaGUI :'(, I . S . Kuten, 2003/07/24
- Re: [paragui-users] Don't R.I.P., ParaGUI :'(, Teunis Peters, 2003/07/24
- Re: [paragui-users] Don't R.I.P., ParaGUI :'(, Antony Shaleynikov, 2003/07/25
- Re: [paragui-users] Don't R.I.P., ParaGUI :'( (now dynamic loading), Teunis Peters, 2003/07/25
- [paragui-users] Why use XML for configuration?, Asko Kauppi, 2003/07/25
- Re: [paragui-users] Why use XML for configuration?,
Roger D. Vargas <=
- [paragui-users] text fields?, leiavoia, 2003/07/25
Re: [paragui-users] Why use XML for configuration?, Teunis Peters, 2003/07/26
Re: [paragui-users] Why use XML for configuration?, Asko Kauppi, 2003/07/26
Re: [paragui-users] Why use XML for configuration?, Mark Junker, 2003/07/26
Re: [paragui-users] Don't R.I.P., ParaGUI :'(, Eric Ross, 2003/07/24
Re: [paragui-users] Don't R.I.P., ParaGUI :'(, Michael Bartl, 2003/07/25