[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++
From: |
Teunis Peters |
Subject: |
Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++ |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:41:18 -0700 (PDT) |
(real quick I made oopsy)
On 26 Jul 2003, Mark Junker wrote:
> > Embedded C++ omits the following features which are useful, but not
> > necessary in an embedded environment:
>
> > * new-style casts
> You're right, this is not allowed because it relys on RTTI.
oops too asleep when I read this. This would have to be macrod - new
compilers -require- this feature...
Sorry. Anyways this is possible...
> > - if it's removed , what the reason to write on C++ ????
> Because you have objects and virtual functions. However, you can use plain C
> with function pointers but it's not very readable.
I've done it. hrm....
Actually I prefer C with (well-written) function pointers/etc to C++...
more extensible and easier to interact with non-C/C++ systems.
G'day, eh? :)
- Teunis
- [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, Mark Junker, 2003/07/25
- Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, Antony Shaleynikov, 2003/07/25
- Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, I . S . Kuten, 2003/07/25
- Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, Teunis Peters, 2003/07/25
- Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, Roger D. Vargas, 2003/07/25
- Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, Teunis Peters, 2003/07/26
- Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, Roger D. Vargas, 2003/07/28
- Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, Teunis Peters, 2003/07/28
- Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, Roger D. Vargas, 2003/07/28
- Re: [paragui-users] ParaGUI && Embedded C++, Teunis Peters, 2003/07/28