Re: [pdf-devel] Symbol name convention

[jemarch]

    >    Hey, I was wondering when are we going to change symbol names to
    >    fit the specs we defined.
    > 
    >    Function names are implicated too, right ?
    > 
    >    Thus, "pdf_alloc()" would be "pdf_b_alloc ()".
    > 
    > I think that it is better to not put an explicit layer mark in symbol
    > names.
    > 

   I'm confused, I thought that was the idea :-/

I considered that it would be too burdensome to put the layer
identification in each symbol defined by the library. I also believe
that to have a unique namespace (i.e. pdf_) will also lead to a better
design by improving the global coherence of the abstractions
implemented in the several layers.