phpgroupware-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] New feature - wml - class.xslttemplates.in


From: Sigurd Nes
Subject: RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] New feature - wml - class.xslttemplates.inc.php
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:10:12 +0200 (CEST)

> From: Dave Hall address@hidden
> Sent: 2006-08-28 10:15:37 CEST
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] New feature - wml - 
> class.xslttemplates.inc.php
> 
> On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 21:00 +0200, Sigurd Nes wrote:
> > Dave Hall wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 14:28 +0200, Sigurd Nes wrote:
> > >> Dave Hall wrote:
> > >>> Hi Sigurd,
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 12:57 +0200, Sigurd Nes wrote:
> > >>>> How about having a detecting-function isMobileUser() - that detects
> > >>>> whether the output should be html or wml - changing the top element of
> > >>>> the stylesheet as something like this:
> > >>>>
> > >>> I would prefer bool browser::is_mobile(), that said it would not be 100%
> > >>> accurate.  Close enough is good enough I suppose :)
> > >>>
> > >>> At the same time WML is more than a DTD.  We would need to output the
> > >>> correct content type headers. And also we would need a WML template set.
> > >>> Given we are less than a week from a fetaure freeze for the API, I think
> > >>> we should look at implementing this in HEAD after the branch, instead of
> > >>> rushing it now.
> > >> My intention is not to implement the full framework at this stage - but
> > >> to enable certain pages within applications.
> > >> To accomplish this - it is enough to disable framework,header and footer
> > >> like this:
> > >>
> > >>  $GLOBALS['phpgw_info']['flags'][noheader] = True;
> > >>  $GLOBALS['phpgw_info']['flags'][nofooter] = True;
> > >>  $GLOBALS['phpgw_info']['flags']['noframework'] = True;
> > >>
> > >> and to have an appropriate xslt-stylesheet for this page (function)
> > >> alone within the application in question.
> > >>
> > >> Any chance ?
> > > 
> > > I will support it if:
> > > 
> > > * is_mobile method is implemented in browser not the template class
> > > * is_mobile is an optional method parameter which defaults to false
> > > * we can work a clean and documented way to handle the template files
> > > * it all gets documented when it goes into cvs :)
> > > 
> > > Maybe others disagree with me.
> > > 
> > Something like this? (attachment)
> 
> I would make the is_mobile a static method of the browser class so it
> can be called easily with execMethod
> 
> As for the implementation in the xslt class i would change the method
> signature from xsl_parse() to xsl_parse($wml_out = false) so no existing
> code is impacted and the if is just doing a binary comparision on the
> method variable, rather than another method call.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Dave
> 

Second try - seems to work fine for me.

Regards

Sigurd

Attachment: wml_2.diff
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]