[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: none
From: |
Ingo Ruhnke |
Subject: |
Re: none |
Date: |
07 Jun 2002 20:58:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
David Philippi <address@hidden> writes:
> It's not a problem of C++, you may write unreadable code in every
> language if you want. The only real problem of C++ is, that it is
> hard to learn it since there's quite a lot to learn.
The problem with C++ is that its still ugly after you have learned it,
beside that it takes forever to learn it..
> Well, this is something a bit too internal for me yet. If I tried to
> work on this right now it would probably produce a lot of errors.
> But I'm still working on include reduction anyway - big cvs commit
> coming very soon. I didn't do any benchmarks, but I'd say that the
> compilation and especially the linking are much faster now in my
> tree.
I have a patch here which removes all boost::shared_ptr<PLF>, should I
commit that or wait for your commit to arive?
--
Advent: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/advent/
Feuerkraft: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/feuerkraft/
Pingus: http://pingus.seul.org/ || ICQ: 59461927
Home: http://pingus.seul.org/~grumbel/ || JabberID: address@hidden
- Re: none, Ingo Ruhnke, 2002/06/07
- Re: none, David Philippi, 2002/06/07
- Re: none, Ingo Ruhnke, 2002/06/07
- Re: none, David Philippi, 2002/06/07
- Re: none,
Ingo Ruhnke <=
- Re: none, David Philippi, 2002/06/07