[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intentional code?
From: |
Neil Hotmail |
Subject: |
Re: Intentional code? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:42:28 +0100 |
> at any point it's valid code and g++ doesn't issue a warning for empty
if's.
> Therefore it may be a good idea to compile with as many warnings as
possible
> in VC++, maybe this will find other problems.
I am doing this at the moment, to pick up other bugs.
The most common issue is use of "if (x);" instead of UNUSEDARG(x), but there
are a few other ones I am finding. Expect a patch with all the small changes
sometime soon.
Ginge
- Bugs on Savannah, Gervase Lam, 2002/10/09
- Re: Bugs on Savannah, Gervase Lam, 2002/10/10
- Re: Bugs on Savannah, Gervase Lam, 2002/10/11
- Intentional code?, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?,
Neil Hotmail <=
- XMLhelper::parse_bool needed?, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/11
- Re: XMLhelper::parse_bool needed?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11
- Re: XMLhelper::parse_bool needed?, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/11
- Re: XMLhelper::parse_bool needed?, Ingo Ruhnke, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, Neil Hotmail, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, Ingo Ruhnke, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11
- Re: Intentional code?, David Philippi, 2002/10/11