pspp-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pspp-cvs] pspp/src/language/stats regression.q ChangeLog


From: Jason H Stover
Subject: [Pspp-cvs] pspp/src/language/stats regression.q ChangeLog
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 03:31:41 +0000

CVSROOT:        /sources/pspp
Module name:    pspp
Changes by:     Jason H Stover <jstover>        08/04/09 03:31:41

Modified files:
        src/language/stats: regression.q ChangeLog 

Log message:
        fixed check for equality of explanatory and predictor variables

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/pspp/src/language/stats/regression.q?cvsroot=pspp&r1=1.71&r2=1.72
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/pspp/src/language/stats/ChangeLog?cvsroot=pspp&r1=1.74&r2=1.75

Patches:
Index: regression.q
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/pspp/pspp/src/language/stats/regression.q,v
retrieving revision 1.71
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -u -b -r1.71 -r1.72
--- regression.q        12 Mar 2008 09:24:44 -0000      1.71
+++ regression.q        9 Apr 2008 03:31:41 -0000       1.72
@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@
   for (i = 0; i < n_variables; i++)
     if (!is_depvar (i, depvar))
       indep_vars[n_indep_vars++] = v_variables[i];
-  if ((n_indep_vars < 2) && is_depvar (0, depvar))
+  if ((n_indep_vars < 1) && is_depvar (0, depvar))
     {
       /*
        There is only one independent variable, and it is the same

Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/pspp/pspp/src/language/stats/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.74
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -b -r1.74 -r1.75
--- ChangeLog   17 Mar 2008 03:59:06 -0000      1.74
+++ ChangeLog   9 Apr 2008 03:31:41 -0000       1.75
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2008-04-08  Jason Stover  <address@hidden>
+
+       * regression.q (identify_indep_vars): Don't panic unless
+       n_indep_vars is 0.
+
 2008-03-16  Ben Pfaff  <address@hidden>
 
        Bug #22037.  Thanks to John Darrington for reporting this bug.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]