[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders
From: |
bojo42 |
Subject: |
Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:06:37 +0100 |
Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2012, 11:41 +0000 schrieb John Darrington:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:51:15AM +0100, bojo42 wrote:
> Sorry guys, it just won't stop ;)
>
> No problem. That's what software development is all about.
>
> Now that we finally have all architectures passed the testsuite in
> Debian i just wanted to push some backports and imports in my PPA for
> Ubuntu.
>
> While this was successful for 10.04 (and i therefore could responded to
> the "PSPP-BUG: Request for help..." mail) it gives me testsuite errors
> for 12.04 on i386 that i again cannot reproduce locally.
>
> The failed suites are: 180 181 438
>
> Please see:
>
> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/96702497/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.pspp_0.7.9%2Bgit20120311-1~bojo1~precise1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
>
> If you can't get a clue out of that i would just try a stupid rebuild.
>
> I don't think a blind rebuild will help.
Yes for sure ;)
> 438 is one of those precision issues probably due to a different compiler or
> math library.
> In fact, the comment in the test shows that we've had similar problems before:
>
> dnl Some machines return .313 instead of .312 for the Point Probability
> dnl (see bug #31611).
> AT_CHECK([sed 's/\.313$/.312/' pspp.csv], [0], [dnl
>
> I think we should just relax the test a bit in a similar fashion.
I have to correct myself, since i can reproduce 438 now locally with
pbuilder but not 180 and 181.
>
> 180 and 181 both relate to reading of openoffice.org spreadsheet files and
> seem
> to be just warnings. I wonder why the problem didn't show up on debian?
> Maybe a
> different libxml library? Since this xml is generated by openoffice itself,
> there's
> probably not much we can do if libxml thinks it is wrong. Perhaps we should
> just
> change the test to ignore the warning.
> However if someone who uses Ubuntu can run the tests manually and get a
> confirmation of
> the problem it would be better.
>
> Does Ubuntu have newer or older libraries than Debian Sid ?
They should nearly be the same. Unfortunatly i don't have much time till
the week end or the start of next week. But i will take a deeper look
then and report back.
>
> J'
>
>
- Copyright in gtk-contrib, bojo42, 2012/03/07
- Re: Copyright in gtk-contrib, Ben Pfaff, 2012/03/08
- Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, Boris Heisel, 2012/03/14
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, John Darrington, 2012/03/14
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders,
bojo42 <=
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, Ben Pfaff, 2012/03/15
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, Ben Pfaff, 2012/03/15
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, bojo42, 2012/03/18
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, John Darrington, 2012/03/18
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, Ben Pfaff, 2012/03/18
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, bojo42, 2012/03/21
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, bojo42, 2012/03/26
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, Ben Pfaff, 2012/03/27