[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Differences in the /IMPORTCASE=... subcommand between SPSS and PSPP
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: Differences in the /IMPORTCASE=... subcommand between SPSS and PSPP |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jan 2016 10:28:48 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:37:12AM +0000, Charles Johnson wrote:
> Something that may be helpful:
>
>
> IBM's documentation sucks, but I paste performing the syntax procedure from
> the user interface, and at least in SPSS 21 to 23, is the same.
>
> SPSS 23 syntax data file:
> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=397603786B365FF6!109&authkey=!AO7tICppDkKC974&ithint=file%2ctxt
>
> In the pasted syntax, the subcommand "SAMPLE 0.1" is added. I am not a fan of
> imposing procedures, but think it may be an option in PSPP and so the user
> chooses to obtain similar results in both SPSS and PSPP.
>
> SPSS wizard screenshot:
> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=397603786B365FF6!106&authkey=!AKjYaLd6-nYP96M&v=3&ithint=photo%2cpng
>
> Example data file:
> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=397603786B365FF6!108&authkey=!AEV5EA0KPMp_Sd4&ithint=file%2ccsv
Thanks for the report and the followup.
I removed support for IMPORTCASES from PSPP, and changed PSPPIRE to use
SAMPLE or N OF CASES instead.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Differences in the /IMPORTCASE=... subcommand between SPSS and PSPP,
Ben Pfaff <=