qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/6] arm/xlnx-zynq: use FDT names


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/6] arm/xlnx-zynq: use FDT names for the Cadence UART
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 14:17:47 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0

On 08.01.2018 13:54, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu,  4 Jan 2018 11:40:44 -0300
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c | 1 +
>>  hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c b/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
>> index 1836a4ed45..c45c364583 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
>> @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ static void zynq_init(MachineState *machine)
>>      sysbus_create_simple("xlnx,ps7-usb", 0xE0002000, pic[53-IRQ_OFFSET]);
>>      sysbus_create_simple("xlnx,ps7-usb", 0xE0003000, pic[76-IRQ_OFFSET]);
>>  
>> +    /* "xlnx,xuartps" */
>>      cadence_uart_create(0xE0000000, pic[59 - IRQ_OFFSET], serial_hds[0]);
>>      cadence_uart_create(0xE0001000, pic[82 - IRQ_OFFSET], serial_hds[1]);
>>  
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c b/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c
>> index 325642058b..38f038786c 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c
>> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_init(Object *obj)
>>      }
>>  
>>      for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_UARTS; i++) {
>> -        object_initialize(&s->uart[i], sizeof(s->uart[i]), 
>> TYPE_CADENCE_UART);
>> +        object_initialize(&s->uart[i], sizeof(s->uart[i]), 
>> "xlnx,zynqmp-uart");
>
> I don't think that commas are valid symbol in type names
> (if I recall correctly it should be letters, numbers and '-')

At least commas are a real PITA when you try to use such devices with
the "-device" CLI parameter. We should try to avoid this if possible, I
think.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]