|
From: | Stefan Weil |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] disas/libvixl: Fix VIXL_FALLTHROUGH macro for QEMU |
Date: | Tue, 15 May 2018 15:13:33 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
Am 15.05.2018 um 14:13 schrieb Peter
Maydell:
On 13 May 2018 at 10:57, Stefan Weil <address@hidden> wrote:Even with the above patch, disas/libvixl raises a compiler warning for a fall through case. The patch below fixes that warning, but I am not sure whether a fall through is correct there. Stefan diff --git a/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/disasm-a64.cc b/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/disasm-a64.cc index 7a58a5c087..5481d94209 100644 --- a/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/disasm-a64.cc +++ b/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/disasm-a64.cc @@ -2986,6 +2986,7 @@ int Disassembler::SubstituteImmediateField(const Instruction* instr, return 3; } } + VIXL_FALLTHROUGH(); // ??? } case 'C': { // ICondB - Immediate Conditional Branch. int64_t offset = instr->ImmCondBranch() << 2;This is fixed in upstream vixl, in fact: https://git.linaro.org/arm/vixl.git/commit/?id=de326f850f736c3a337fda52845ed3d2e620cc02 thanks -- PMM
+#elif __GNUC__ == 7
How do we proceed with the code in QEMU? Do you have a plan to update the vixl code? As vixl is obviously no longer maintained on GitHub, I am not sure whom I could contact. And what about my other question / suggestion: "I suggest to add and use a similar macro QEMU_FALLTHROUGH() for the rest of the code and can provide a patch if that's fine for everyone." gcc gives lots of fallthrough warnings, and many code locations don't contain a comment stating that the fall through is fine. Thanks Stefan |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |