[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add new CD-ROM related qtes
From: |
John Snow |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add new CD-ROM related qtests |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Apr 2018 15:34:32 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
On 04/02/2018 02:39 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 29.03.2018 20:28, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/16/2018 01:39 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> With one of my clean-up patches (see commit 1454509726719e0933c800), I
>>> recently accidentially broke the "-cdrom" parameter (more precisely
>>> "-drive if=scsi") on a couple of boards, since there was no error
>>> detected during the "make check" regression testing. This is clearly an
>>> indication that we are lacking tests in this area.
>>> So this small patch series now introduces some tests for CD-ROM drives:
>>> The first two patches introduce the possibility to check that booting
>>> from CD-ROM drives still works fine for x86 and s390x, and the third
>>> patch adds a test that certain machines can at least still be started
>>> with the "-cdrom" parameter (i.e. that test would have catched the
>>> mistake that I did with my SCSI cleanup patch).
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Use g_spawn_sync() instead of execlp() to run genisoimage
>>> - The "-cdrom" parameter test is now run on all architectures (with
>>> machine "none" for the machines that are not explicitly checked)
>>> - Some rewordings and improved comments here and there
>>>
>>> Thomas Huth (3):
>>> tests/boot-sector: Add magic bytes to s390x boot code header
>>> tests/cdrom-test: Test booting from CD-ROM ISO image file
>>> tests/cdrom-test: Test that -cdrom parameter is working
>>>
>>> tests/Makefile.include | 2 +
>>> tests/boot-sector.c | 9 +-
>>> tests/cdrom-test.c | 222
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 tests/cdrom-test.c
>>>
>>
>> New file, but no edit to MAINTAINERS.
>
> Which section do you suggest? It tests IDE CD-ROMs, SCSI CD-ROMs, and
> even virtio-block (on s390x) ... so I have a hard time to decide where
> this should belong to...
>
> Thomas
>
I was hoping you'd figure it out, but fine :D
You can stick it under my section if you want, but I'll probably defer
to you if the s390x parts break.
--js