Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] iotests: Add test for rebasing with relative paths

[Max Reitz]

On 2018-05-09 19:24, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/09/2018 10:49 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>   tests/qemu-iotests/024     | 82
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   tests/qemu-iotests/024.out | 30 +++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/024 b/tests/qemu-iotests/024
>> index e0d77ce2f5..4071ed6093 100755
>> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/024
>> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/024
>> @@ -29,9 +29,14 @@ status=1    # failure is the default!
>>     _cleanup()
>>   {
>> -    _cleanup_test_img
>> -    rm -f "$TEST_DIR/t.$IMGFMT.base_old"
>> -    rm -f "$TEST_DIR/t.$IMGFMT.base_new"
>> +    _cleanup_test_img
>> +    rm -f "$TEST_DIR/t.$IMGFMT.base_old"
>> +    rm -f "$TEST_DIR/t.$IMGFMT.base_new"
>> +
>> +    rm -f "$TEST_DIR/subdir/t.$IMGFMT"
>> +    rm -f "$TEST_DIR/subdir/t.$IMGFMT.base_old"
>> +    rm -f "$TEST_DIR/subdir/t.$IMGFMT.base_new"
>> +    rmdir "$TEST_DIR/subdir" 2> /dev/null
> 
> Any easier to just 'rm -rf "$TEST_DIR/subdir"' instead of calling out
> individual files?

Sure it would be easier, but I decided against it on the basis that I
personally don’t like to call rm -rf on cleanup.

(Because if I mess something up, I might hurt somebody really bad, and
that somebody might be myself.)

> And was Jeff ever going to finish the iotests
> cleanups that took care of cleanup globally by running tests in a
> per-test directory in preparation for running tests in parallel?

If that was a question to me, I’m afraid I don’t know the status of that...

Max

> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature