Re: [Qemu-devel] replies

[Jim C. Brown]

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 09:04:53AM +0200, Renzo Davoli wrote:
> > Tap would be the more appropriate as entire packets with data-link header 
> > are exchanged.
> I mean, tun or tap are just names, the interfaces within vde or qemu
> (AFAIK) are opened as "IFF_TAP" so they are tap even when named tun.
> 
> renzo
> 

If that is the case, then qemu should be naming the devices as "tap0",
"tap1", etc. To open a TAP device with the name of "tun0" is just plain
confusing. (Unless we want to go "qemu0", "qemu1", etc.)

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.