[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features
From: |
Antony T Curtis |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Jul 2004 18:32:33 +0100 |
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 16:37, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Natalia Portillo wrote:
> > * 1 Chipset (Intel Natoma)
> >
> > We should have more?
> > If anyone can put more, great!
>
> How many chipset do you know that support Intel's Pentium Pro? Another
> chipset might require MMX/SSE support, not mentioning the BIOS support
> which is needed...
I don't think that the chipset particularly cares what extended
instructions the CPU can execute... However, BIOS support we are
definitely lacking. IIRC, the BIOS we are using doesn't do any PCI setup
- so we rely on some code in pc.c and pci.c to make the chipset look
configured and to set up the BARs.
--
Antony T Curtis <address@hidden>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features, Natalia Portillo, 2004/07/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features, Hetz Ben Hamo, 2004/07/09
- RE: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features, Natalia Portillo, 2004/07/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features,
Antony T Curtis <=
- RE: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features, Natalia Portillo, 2004/07/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features, Jim C. Brown, 2004/07/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features, Hetz Ben Hamo, 2004/07/09
- RE: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features, Natalia Portillo, 2004/07/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] (Before) RFC for new features, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/07/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC for new features, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/07/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC for new features, Antony T Curtis, 2004/07/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC for new features, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/07/10