[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virual
From: |
Sander Nagtegaal |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virual PC |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:59:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Are you talking about pseudo little-endian mode on a G3/G4? Make no mistakes
that would speed up the emulation by about 30/50% ( Atleast it did on Virtual
PC )
I've been asking about this before but got no replies from here at all.
Also..........since QEMU-fast only works on a modified Linux kernel and makes
QEMU about 50% faster ( atleast that's what the website says ) is there a way
to make QEMU-fast work on WINDOWS/95/98/2000/NT/XP to? I suppose Virtual PC
does this somehow. No idea how though..........
Op zaterdag 10 juli 2004 6:41 am, schreef Fred Hope:
> >> I think that including support for the PowerPC swapping instructions
>
> in QEMU
>
> >> will break compatibility with host PowerPCs before G3, so that
>
> instructions
>
> >> should be used in a run-time capability detection scheme.
> >
> >It also dosen't work on the 970 (G5) - one of my friends has been
> >waiting for QEMU for OS X for that reason ;)
>
> About breaking support for PowerPCs before G3, I wouldn't think that
> matters, since OS X only runs on G3 and later unless you use a special
> hack or something.
>
> But if it doesn't work on the G5, then yeah hopefully it can be
> controlled at runtime and still let G3/G4 users have this stuff.
>
> Anyone care to explain to me what this stuff we're talking about
> actually does? :) Sorry but I dunno much about processor instructions
> and stuff. I assume it would make QEMU faster...would it make any
> substantial difference, or add any other features?
>
> Fred Hope
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel