[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark?
From: |
Kazu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2006 16:24:58 +0900 |
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:23 PM Christian MICHON wrote:
>On 5/16/06, Kazu <address@hidden> wrote:
>> It is normal that 2.4 kernel boots faster than 2.6 kernel, isn't it? I
don't
>> know why Solaris x86 10 doesn't work.
>solaris works, it's just painfully slow.
>lots of time is wasted in ide-probing inside 2.6.x, because of the
>way time is measured in the qemu guest.
>Maybe recompiling 2.6.x guest kernel, telling it which internal timer to
>use would be better. Does anyone know how to do this or tried it already?
Fedora Core 3 doesn't boot in 0.8.0 binary. But it boots almost the same
speed in 0.8.1 binary as on Linux host.
I measured FC3 booting time without kqemu.
On WinXP host:
0.8.0 binary can't boot.
0.8.1 binary 4min 15sec
On Linux host:
0.8.0 4min 15sec
0.8.1 4min 5sec
I measured Knoppix v3.8 booting time.
On WinXP host: fb800x600 desktop=icewm
0.8.0 5min 54sec
0.8.1 3min 4sec
>From Knoppix booting, I think time for scanning hardware is improved as on
Linux host.
I think the problem is not related to measuring time.
Regards,
Kazu
- [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark?, Mikhail Ramendik, 2006/05/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark?, Lonnie Mendez, 2006/05/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark?, Kazu, 2006/05/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark?, Lonnie Mendez, 2006/05/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark?, Fabrice Bellard, 2006/05/17