[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests.
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests. |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:45:18 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
> > If you really want to do this, do it properly. Make it an error to use a
> > ro image if the user [implicitly] requests rw access.
>
> If there's no middle ground between "silently misbehave" and "refuse to
> start if anything _might_ be wrong", then why does current qemu warn about
> the 1024 hz thing?
Even at 1024Hz qemu still misbehaves, especially on heavily loaded hosts.
1024Hz is sufficient for most common operating systems most of the time, but
many will run happily without it. e.g. many linux kernels only need 100 or
250Hz.
Paul
- [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Rob Landley, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Paul Brook, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Rob Landley, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Dan Shearer, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Paul Brook, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Ed Swierk, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Paul Brook, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Daniel Jacobowitz, 2007/02/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Rob Landley, 2007/02/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests.,
Paul Brook <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests., Jan Marten Simons, 2007/02/12
- CAP_NET_ADMIN (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests.), Kevin F. Quinn, 2007/02/10
- Re: CAP_NET_ADMIN (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests.), Paul Brook, 2007/02/10
- Re: CAP_NET_ADMIN (was Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests.), Chris Friedhoff, 2007/02/12
[Qemu-devel] QEMU and SMP Option on dual core processor, Danny Chieh-Yao, Cheng, 2007/02/12