[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Reducing X communication bandwidth, take 2
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Reducing X communication bandwidth, take 2 |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:38:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
> > Will this work also for the CL542x adaptor? (Does that fall in the
> > category of vga?) My current hack works for with/without -std-vga and I
> > think that's because it lives "underneath" both, in the connection to
> > SDL.
>
> Each adapter will have to do it's own minimization but that's sort of
> the write thing anyway IMHO. How granular each update is really only
> depends on the adapter. For instance, the VMware adapter really
> shouldn't need to do any minimization at all.
It would be nice if we could share the framebuffer blitting routines. We've
currently got 3 different implementations (vga/cirrus, tcx and pl110) of
basically the same framebuffer rendering routines.
Paul
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Reducing X communication bandwidth, take 2, Julian Seward, 2007/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Reducing X communication bandwidth, take 2, Anthony Liguori, 2007/03/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Reducing X communication bandwidth, take 2, Julian Seward, 2007/03/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Reducing X communication bandwidth, take 2, Anthony Liguori, 2007/03/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Reducing X communication bandwidth, take 2,
Paul Brook <=
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Reducing X communication bandwidth, take 2, Brian Johnson, 2007/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Reducing X communication bandwidth, take 2, Anthony Liguori, 2007/03/25