[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:26:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
> Well, we got the same behavior on PowerPC. What I was thinking of is
> that if we fix the VLE problems, the fix, if done in a proper way, could
> also allow benefit to RISC targets. What I don't know is; would we
> really have a benefit not stopping translation on page boundaries ?
[ I meant to say in my previous mail, but got cut during editing ]
I suspect that we're going to want/need to break the TB to get the exception
semantics right, so for RISC targets there's no point having TBs that span a
page boundary.
Paul
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, Paul Brook, 2007/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, J. Mayer, 2007/10/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, Paul Brook, 2007/10/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, Fabrice Bellard, 2007/10/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, J. Mayer, 2007/10/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, Paul Brook, 2007/10/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, J. Mayer, 2007/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, Paul Brook, 2007/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, J. Mayer, 2007/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation, Paul Brook, 2007/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation,
Paul Brook <=