qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat


From: Aurelien Jarno
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix NaN handling in softfloat
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:46:12 +0100
User-agent: IceDove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070328)

Thiemo Seufer a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:06:04PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 06:35:48PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The current softfloat implementation changes qNaN into sNaN when 
>>>> converting between formats, for no reason. The attached patch fixes
>>>> that. It also fixes an off-by-one in the extended double precision
>>>> format (aka floatx80), the mantissa is 64-bit long and not 63-bit
>>>> long.
>>>>
>>>> With this patch applied all the glibc 2.7 floating point tests
>>>> are successfull on MIPS and MIPSEL.
>>> FYI, I posted a similar patch and haven't had time to get back to it.
>>> Andreas reminded me that we need to make sure at least one mantissa
>>> bit is set.  If we're confident that the common NaN format will
>>> already have some bit other than the qnan/snan bit set, this is fine;
>>> otherwise, we might want to forcibly set some other mantissa bit.
>>>
>> Please find an updated patch below. I have tried to match real x86, MIPS,
>> HPPA, PowerPC and SPARC hardware when all mantissa bits are cleared.
> 
> The default NaN pattern for MIPS and HPPA were broken. (Fabrice spotted
> this.) I currently have the appended patch, it assumes HPPA is similiar
> to MIPS, which is probably incorrect.

HPPA only generates different NaN values, appart from that it behaves
the same as MIPS. On the other side, target-hppa is not yet implemented
(even if some patches could be found on the web).

>> Index: fpu/softfloat-specialize.h
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/fpu/softfloat-specialize.h,v
>> retrieving revision 1.3
>> diff -u -d -p -r1.3 softfloat-specialize.h
>> --- fpu/softfloat-specialize.h       11 May 2007 17:10:14 -0000      1.3
>> +++ fpu/softfloat-specialize.h       3 Nov 2007 21:17:57 -0000
>> @@ -120,9 +120,17 @@ static commonNaNT float32ToCommonNaN( fl
>>  
>>  static float32 commonNaNToFloat32( commonNaNT a )
>>  {
>> -
>> -    return ( ( (bits32) a.sign )<<31 ) | 0x7FC00000 | ( a.high>>41 );
>> -
>> +    bits32 mantissa = a.high>>41;
>> +    if (mantissa)
>> +        return ( ( (bits32) a.sign )<<31 ) | 0x7F800000 | ( mantissa );
>> +    else
>> +#if defined(TARGET_MIPS)
>> +        return ( ( (bits32) a.sign )<<31 ) | 0x7FBFFFFF | ( mantissa );
>> +#elif defined(TARGET_HPPA)
>> +        return ( ( (bits32) a.sign )<<31 ) | 0x7FA00000 | ( mantissa );
>> +#else
>> +        return ( ( (bits32) a.sign )<<31 ) | 0x7FC00000;
>> +#endif
> 
> This looks odd. Do MIPS and HPPA really need a specialcase here but none
> for doubles? Could you re-check with my patch applied?

That's because there is no greater precision than double precision on
MIPS and HPPA (for the latter I am not 100% sure), so you can't loose
precision on the mantissa when converting to double precision.

I have looked quickly at your patch, it looks like the right approach to
define target specific things at only one place in the file. I will get
a closer tomorrow.

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno             | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   address@hidden         | address@hidden
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]