qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sparc: move sun4c to it's own hwdef


From: Robert Reif
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sparc: move sun4c to it's own hwdef
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:53:15 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 SeaMonkey/1.1.12

Blue Swirl wrote:
On 10/27/08, Robert Reif <address@hidden> wrote:
This patch moves sun4c ss2 to it's own hwdef and does some simple cleanups.
 Other sun4c cleanups are possible but they can come later.

Thanks, applied. What cleanups do you have in mind?




Index: hw/sun4m.c
===================================================================
--- hw/sun4m.c  (revision 5557)
+++ hw/sun4m.c  (working copy)
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
     long vram_size, nvram_size;
     // IRQ numbers are not PIL ones, but master interrupt controller
     // register bit numbers
-    int intctl_g_intr, esp_irq, le_irq, clock_irq, clock1_irq;
+    int esp_irq, le_irq, clock_irq, clock1_irq;
     int ser_irq, ms_kb_irq, fd_irq, me_irq, cs_irq, ecc_irq;
     uint8_t nvram_machine_id;
     uint16_t machine_id;
@@ -135,12 +135,12 @@
     target_phys_addr_t intctl_base, counter_base, nvram_base, ms_kb_base;
     target_phys_addr_t serial_base, fd_base;
     target_phys_addr_t idreg_base, dma_base, esp_base, le_base;
-    target_phys_addr_t tcx_base, cs_base, apc_base, aux1_base, aux2_base;
+    target_phys_addr_t tcx_base, aux1_base;
     long vram_size, nvram_size;
     // IRQ numbers are not PIL ones, but master interrupt controller
     // register bit numbers
-    int intctl_g_intr, esp_irq, le_irq, clock_irq, clock1_irq;
-    int ser_irq, ms_kb_irq, fd_irq, me_irq, cs_irq;
+    int esp_irq, le_irq, clock_irq, clock1_irq;
+    int ser_irq, ms_kb_irq, fd_irq, me_irq;
     uint8_t nvram_machine_id;
     uint16_t machine_id;
     uint32_t iommu_version;
@@ -1440,7 +1440,6 @@
     {
         .iommu_base   = 0xf8000000,
         .tcx_base     = 0xfe000000,
-        .cs_base      = -1,
         .slavio_base  = 0xf6000000,
         .intctl_base  = 0xf5000000,
         .counter_base = 0xf3000000,
@@ -1451,9 +1450,7 @@
         .dma_base     = 0xf8400000,
         .esp_base     = 0xf8800000,
         .le_base      = 0xf8c00000,
-        .apc_base     = -1,
         .aux1_base    = 0xf7400003,
-        .aux2_base    = -1,
         .vram_size    = 0x00100000,
         .nvram_size   = 0x800,
         .esp_irq = 2,
@@ -1464,7 +1461,6 @@
         .ser_irq = 1,
         .fd_irq = 1,
         .me_irq = 1,
-        .cs_irq = -1,
         .nvram_machine_id = 0x55,
         .machine_id = ss2_id,
         .max_mem = 0x10000000,
@@ -1579,8 +1575,7 @@
     slavio_serial_init(hwdef->serial_base, slavio_irq[hwdef->ser_irq],
                        serial_hds[1], serial_hds[0]);
 
-    slavio_misc = slavio_misc_init(0, hwdef->apc_base,
-                                   hwdef->aux1_base, hwdef->aux2_base,
+    slavio_misc = slavio_misc_init(0, -1, hwdef->aux1_base, -1,
                                    slavio_irq[hwdef->me_irq], env, &fdc_tc);
 
     if (hwdef->fd_base != (target_phys_addr_t)-1) {

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]