qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add BIOS splash image support


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add BIOS splash image support
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:44:01 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 04:04:57PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka schrieb:
>>> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> Yes, please. I hate this artificial delay, specifically as I have to do
>>>>> a lot of short boot tests where this contributes noticeably to their
>>>>> execution time. But, as usual, it didn't hurt enough to make me hack a
>>>>> patch yet. I'm willing to do this if we can agree on how it should be 
>>>>> done.
>>>> Show the boot menu only on case no "-boot whatever" cmd line option is
>>>> present?
>>> I would say only when there is -bootmenu as Gleb suggested. I'm half
>>> done with this approach already.
>> I like Gerd's approach better as it doesn't introduce yet another
>> command line parameter. It makes sense to me that you don't want a menu
>> if you specify -boot.
> 
> Actually no it doesn't. The reason the original author wrote this 
> boot menu patch was explicitly so that if you had used a '-boot d'
> arg, you could do a one-time override from the BIOS screen.
> 
> One other alternative to added a brand new arg is to just allow an extra
> meta-character in -boot arg to indicate that it should prompt or not
> 
>   -boot d    (use cdrom)
> 
> vs
> 
>   -boot d+   (default cdrom, prompt to allow override)
> 
> but perhaps that's a bit obtuse
> 

-boot d,ask would make more sense to me (as it is more verbose).

BTW, a few interruptions later I meanwhile had the chance to realize
that QEMU's bios.diff does not yet carry and fw_cfg bits, right? Does
its binary include them? Or is this currently kvm-only stuff?

<confused> Jan




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]