qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix loading tiny kernels


From: Rene Rebe
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix loading tiny kernels
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:02:51 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080616)

Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 12:09:42PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 03.02.2009, at 11:30, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:06:10AM +0100, Ren? Rebe wrote:
I babbled:
Further testing / polishing the multi-boot kernel loading support I found the existing code fails to load unusual small kernels, less than 8192
bytes -
for example the example multi-boot kernel shipped within GRUB that
compiles to just 7121 bytes on my system.

Signed-off-by: René Rebe <address@hidden>

--- hw/pc.c     (revision 6501)
+++ hw/pc.c     (working copy)
@@ -554,7 +989,7 @@
 /* load the kernel header */
 f = fopen(kernel_filename, "rb");
 if (!f || !(kernel_size = get_file_size(f)) ||
-    fread(header, 1, 1024, f) != 1024) {
+    fread(header, 1, MIN(8192, kernel_size), f) != MIN(8192,
kernel_size)) {
 fprintf(stderr, "qemu: could not load kernel '%s'\n",
     kernel_filename);
 exit(1);

Ah, sorry - mix in the series. This only applies to the multi-boot series
which increases the header read to 8192 bytes.
Regardless, this code should not hardcode the size like this. It should use sizeof(header) instead of 1024 or 8192, thus avoiding the potential
bug.
You don't really know sizeof(header), do you? Header could be the Linux header or the Multiboot header which is by definition allowed to sit somewhere within the first 8192 bytes.

I meant in terms of making sure we didn't overflow the header variable
which is allocated on the stack. So instead of

    uint8_t header[1024];
    ...
    fread(header, 1, 1024, f);

You'd have

    uint8_t header[1024];
    ...
    fread(header, 1, sizeof(header), f);

Daniel

Just preventing this in the case it's changed in the future and
one place is forgotten.

I already changed the code to use the ARRAY_SIZE macro in my
working copy:

  http://svn.exactcode.de/t2/trunk/package/emulators/kvm/09-qemu-multiboot.patch

--
  René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
  http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]