[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC] More robust migration
From: |
Jamie Lokier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC] More robust migration |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:54:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Charles Duffy wrote:
> Andre Przywara wrote:
> >1. Transfer configuration data. Currently there is no VM configuration
> >data transferred with the stream. One has to start QEMU/KVM with the
> >_exact_ same parameters on the other side to allow migration. If there
> >would be a pseudo-device (transferred first) holding these parameters
> >(and other runtime dependent stuff like kvm_enabled()) this would ease
> >migration a lot.
>
> I presently have code which *relies* on the ability to migrate from one
> VM to a target with different different backing stores for their disk
> images (albeit sharing the same contents).
>
> If this ability were to be removed, that would be unfortunate.
Also, how else are we to migrate running systems from qcow2 - which
should never be used but this wasn't obvious before - to raw? :-)
-- Jamie
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Anthony Liguori, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Avi Kivity, 2009/02/24
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/20
[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC] More robust migration, Charles Duffy, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC] More robust migration,
Jamie Lokier <=