Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] Add module infrastructure to QEMU

[Avi Kivity]

Paul Brook wrote:
> On Monday 11 May 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
> > This is the current state of a patch set to introduce a module
> > infrastructure to QEMU.
> >     
>
> I don't think numeric priorities are a good idea. If we have dependencies then 
> we should be dealing with them properly, not hacking round the problem.
>
> Also, there's no reason to have destructors. The init function can register 
> these at runtime.
>   

Agree to both.

> There's also the issue that shared libraries imply it's OK for third parties 
> to ship binary plugins.
>   

Can't we add wording to LICENSE to address this?  I'd really like to 
allow GPL plugins.  Linux and now gcc allow this.


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function